The Nashville Christian Couple's Guide to a More Alive Intimate Marriage
- Scott Schwertly
- May 29
- 7 min read
Brittney and I both came from faith backgrounds that shaped us in ways we're still discovering. The convictions that formed us — about marriage, about faithfulness, about the sacred nature of covenant — are genuine and important. They are part of who we are. They have been, in many ways, the foundation of what we've built together.
They also handed us a specific set of challenges around intimate life that took years to fully understand.
Not because the faith itself was the problem. The faith, taken seriously and read carefully, points toward some of the most profound and generous understandings of embodied intimacy and married love available in any tradition. But the specific way that faith formation around sexuality often gets delivered — what it prohibits without articulating what it invites, what it restrains without equipping, what it asks couples to bring to a marriage bed without ever preparing them for — leaves a gap that most faith-formed couples carry without naming.
If you're a Nashville Christian couple and something has gone quiet in your intimate marriage — if you've wondered whether the fullness of what intimacy in marriage is supposed to feel like is actually available to you — this post is for you.
What the Research Shows About Faith and Intimate Life
The data on faith and marital intimacy tells a more nuanced and ultimately more hopeful story than most people expect.
A 2025 Focus on the Family poll surveying more than 3,800 Americans found that what the researchers call "convictional" Christians — those who actively practice their faith together — reported the highest levels of self-assessed marriage health of any subgroup analyzed. These couples scored higher than any other group on 32 dimensions of marriage health, including trust, compassion, responsibility, and the overall quality of their connection.
Research from the Wheatley Institution found that couples unified in religious practices at home — shared prayer, scripture engagement, regular church attendance — show significantly better levels of relationship quality, strong emotional closeness, and high sexual satisfaction than couples without that shared faith foundation. The report's language is worth quoting directly: spiritual intimacy, the researchers found, greatly strengthens a couple's sexual bond. Intimate connection, in this framework, is a meaningful physical manifestation of the emotional and spiritual intimacy shared between partners.
According to 2026 Christian marriage statistics compiled from multiple research sources, couples who pray together daily report a 90% or higher rate of relationship satisfaction. Couples who attend church together are significantly less likely to experience the relational deterioration that the absence of shared spiritual practice correlates with.
The data, in other words, supports what the theological tradition has always taught: that genuine faith-grounded marriage, practiced with intentionality and mutual investment, produces some of the most flourishing intimate relationships available.
And yet — there is a significant gap between what the research shows is possible and what many Nashville Christian couples are actually experiencing in their intimate lives.
The Gap Between What Faith Promises and What Most Christian Couples Experience
Research on evangelical sexuality tells a more uncomfortable story alongside the positive findings above.
A survey of more than 20,000 married evangelical women conducted by Sheila Wray Gregoire and published through Bare Marriage found a 47-point orgasm gap in evangelical marriages — with 95% of men reporting orgasm consistently, compared to 48% of women. The research also identified specific messaging patterns common in evangelical sexual formation — about obligation, about female sexuality as primarily for the husband's benefit, about the body as something to be managed rather than inhabited — that the researchers found directly correlated with lower intimate satisfaction for women in those marriages.
This is not an indictment of faith. It is an indictment of incomplete formation — of a tradition that prepared couples for the what of marriage without adequately preparing them for the how of intimate aliveness within it.
The specific pattern I see consistently in faith-formed Nashville couples reflects this gap. Deep conviction about the sanctity of marriage. Genuine love and commitment to each other. And a intimate life that has never quite become what both partners sensed it could be — not because the love isn't real, but because neither partner was ever given the language, the permission, or the practical guidance to build something genuinely alive in this dimension of their covenant.
What the Theological Tradition Actually Supports
The fully formed theological understanding of sexuality within Christian marriage is significantly more generous, more embodied, and more affirmative of intimate aliveness than the formation most faith-formed adults received.
The Song of Solomon — eight chapters of the most explicit and joyful erotic poetry in scripture — presents desire within marriage not as a concession to human weakness but as a celebration of created goodness. The lovers in the Song describe each other's bodies with delight. They pursue each other with genuine longing. They celebrate the pleasure of embodied intimate connection as something sacred rather than something to be managed.
Most Nashville Christian couples were never taught this. The Song was either skipped, allegorized into something non-erotic, or mentioned briefly and moved past. The prohibition was clear. The invitation was absent.
The invitation that the full theological tradition supports is this: that within the covenant of marriage, embodied desire, genuine pleasure, and the full aliveness of intimate connection are not just permitted but are part of the sacred gift of the relationship. A marriage in which one or both partners never experiences genuine intimate aliveness — never feels fully seen, fully met, fully present in their body and their desire — is not living into the fullness of what the covenant actually offers.
Five Specific Challenges Nashville Christian Couples Face — And What Addresses Each
1. Shame that outlasted the prohibition.
Many Nashville Christian couples brought inherited shame about desire and the body into their marriages — shame formed before marriage as a protective prohibition that was never deactivated once the context changed. The wedding ceremony does not automatically neutralize years of formation around the wrongness of sexual feeling.
What addresses this: honest, explicit conversation about what each partner absorbed about sexuality in their formation — and a deliberate process of separating genuine values from accumulated shame that was never theirs to carry. This is work that coaching can support directly.
2. Formation for restraint without formation for aliveness.
Most faith formation around sexuality prepared people to restrain desire. Very little prepared them to cultivate, express, and genuinely inhabit it within marriage. The result is couples who are faithful and committed and whose intimate lives have never become fully alive — not from lack of love but from lack of formation.
What addresses this: the positive formation that was absent — the language for desire, the permission to pursue genuine intimate aliveness, the practical frameworks (like the Erotic Blueprint work) that help both partners understand their own erotic wiring and communicate it honestly within the safety of the covenant.
3. The obligation dynamic.
Research on evangelical sexuality consistently identifies the obligation framework — the understanding of sexual intimacy as primarily a duty one partner owes the other — as one of the most significant suppressors of genuine intimate desire and satisfaction in Christian marriages, particularly for women. Intimacy experienced as obligation produces exactly the quality of going-through-the-motions that both partners experience as flatness.
What addresses this: a reframing of intimate connection within marriage from obligation to genuine mutual gift — and the practical work of creating the conditions (emotional safety, honest communication, genuine attunement to each other's desires) that make intimate connection genuinely desirable for both partners rather than dutiful for one.
4. The body as obstacle rather than gift.
Formation that presents the body primarily as a source of temptation to be managed produces adults who relate to their own physical experience as a liability rather than an asset — and who have difficulty accessing genuine embodied presence in intimate encounters because they've spent years learning to manage rather than inhabit their physical experience.
What addresses this: somatic work that develops a genuinely positive, embodied relationship with the body as something created good — worth inhabiting, worth attending to, worth bringing fully into intimate connection with a partner.
5. The silence that substitutes for conversation.
Most Nashville Christian couples have never had a genuinely honest, specific conversation about what each partner wants from their intimate life — what they've been longing for, what they've been missing, what genuine aliveness in their intimate marriage would actually look like for each of them. The combination of shame, the absence of positive formation, and the cultural expectation that these conversations aren't appropriate has left enormous territory unexplored.
What addresses this: the specific courage to have the conversation — and often, the safe container of a coaching engagement to make that conversation feel possible for the first time.
A Word About This Work's Relationship to Faith
I want to be direct about something: the work I do with faith-formed Nashville couples is not designed to move them away from their convictions. It is designed to help them more fully inhabit them.
The covenant of marriage that most Nashville Christian couples have entered is a genuinely sacred commitment — and the intimate aliveness that this post points toward is not in tension with that sacredness. It is an expression of it. A marriage that is faithful, committed, and genuinely intimate — in which both partners feel fully known, fully desired, and fully alive in the embodied gift of their covenant — is not a compromise of Christian marriage. It is Christian marriage at its fullest.
I work from that conviction. And I bring it to every couple I work with who is navigating the specific intersection of genuine faith and the desire for something more genuinely alive in their intimate life.
Book a free discovery call and let's have an honest, faith-informed conversation about what a more fully alive intimate marriage could look like for you — in a space that takes both your faith and your intimate life seriously.
And if you'd like to begin exploring privately, Coelle offers guided audio intimacy experiences designed for individuals and couples who are ready to invest in this dimension of their lives — in a warm, shame-free space that honors rather than dismisses the full complexity of who they are.
Scott Schwertly is a Nashville-based sex and intimacy coach, founder of Coelle, and co-host of Do You Feel That? with his wife Brittney.
Comments