All Posts

I want to begin this post with something I say directly to couples navigating infidelity's aftermath: this is territory where coaching has real limits, and I want to be honest about that before saying anything else. The acute aftermath of betrayal is clinical territory. What I want to address is what comes after — the specific question many couples eventually arrive at: what happens to desire after betrayal, and is it actually possible to rebuild something genuinely alive?

Brittney and I got married in our late thirties. We were in love, we were committed, and we were completely unprepared for the specific ways that early marriage would challenge our intimate connection. Not the relationship itself — the relationship was good. What we weren't prepared for was the quiet shift that happens when intimacy moves from something you pursue with desire and uncertainty into something you now have guaranteed access to.

Every coaching engagement I begin involves a discovery call. And somewhere in that first conversation I ask a question that almost always produces a pause. The pause is the point. The question is: "When did you last feel genuinely alive in your body — fully present, fully connected, with no part of you watching from the outside?" What people say when they answer it tells me more about where they actually are than almost anything else. Here's what the three most common answers

I've been attending The Belonging Co here in Nashville for several years. It's a church I genuinely love. I'm not writing this as a critique of any specific church. I'm writing it as someone who sits in Nashville's faith communities, loves them, and has spent years noticing a specific gap that most of them share. The prohibition side is well-developed.

I am not a naturally breathwork-oriented person. I came to this work through my head — through frameworks, through research, through analytical processing. The idea that paying deliberate attention to my breath could meaningfully shift my presence with Brittney felt, when I first encountered it, like exactly the kind of thing that works for other people. What changed my mind was experience.

There's a specific quality to the distance that settles into a relationship after a long season of disconnection. It doesn't announce itself. It's just — there. A flatness. A guardedness neither partner fully chose. Brittney and I have been inside that pattern. What I know from our own experience and the couples I work with is that rebuilding after a long season of distance is genuinely possible — but it requires a different approach than most couples instinctively reach for.

I think about the couple I might have been at twenty-five if I'd grown up in 2026 instead of the late nineties. I already had a complicated relationship with vulnerability. But I came of age when the social infrastructure for meeting people — in person, through shared community — was still largely intact. The young adults navigating dating in 2026 are doing so in conditions that make the specific discomfort of genuine intimate pursuit significantly more avoidable than ever.

Brittney and I have never lived apart. Three kids, one house, two businesses, and the full chaos of a shared Nashville life. But I've been paying attention to the Living Apart Together trend — because the research behind it reveals something genuinely useful for couples who share a home and have no intention of changing that. Here's what the LAT data shows about intimate connection — and what any Nashville couple can steal from it.

When our youngest was born — the third of three children in six years — Brittney and I were navigating a postpartum season that was simultaneously our most experienced and our most exhausting. We knew more about what to expect. And we were still, in many of the ways that matter most, starting over. The postpartum season is genuinely unlike any other season a couple's intimate life moves through.

I want to be careful with this topic from the beginning — because the word generous has been used in intimate contexts in ways that have caused real harm, and I want to be precise about what I mean. The harmful version of sexual generosity — the idea that a wife's intimate generosity means availability regardless of her own desire — is not what I mean. What I mean is something more mutual, more genuine, and genuinely more transformative. Here's what the research shows about w

There's a specific shift I noticed in year seven — after Brittney and I started rebuilding our intimate connection — that I didn't have language for until much later. The quality of our physical intimacy changed. Not because we introduced new techniques. But because something changed in the hours before intimate encounter — in how I was actually present with Brittney during the evening rather than managing logistics from a distracted distance. What I was experiencing, without

I want to begin with something I say directly to the clients I work with navigating this territory: starting over intimately after divorce or loss is one of the most courageous things a person can do. Not because it requires bravery in some abstract sense. Because it requires bringing genuine openness into a space where you've already been significantly hurt — and doing it anyway. This post is for Nashville's second-chapter people.

Brittney and I have talked honestly about what year seven felt like — the flatness, the routine, the sense that something genuinely alive had quietly slipped away without either of us making a decision for it to go. Most couples who navigate intimate fading describe it the same way. Not a crisis. Not a betrayal. Just a gradual dimming. A 2026 study of 300,000 couples examined exactly this dynamic. Here's what they found — and what it means for getting it back.

Brittney and I both came from faith backgrounds that shaped us in ways we're still discovering. The convictions that formed us — about marriage, about faithfulness, about the sacred nature of covenant — are genuine and important. They also handed us specific challenges around intimate life that took years to fully understand. Not because the faith itself was the problem. Because of the gap between what it prohibits and what it never quite taught us to build.

There's a specific memory from our year seven season that I return to when I'm trying to explain what intentional intimacy actually feels like from the inside. Brittney and I had made an agreement one evening: nothing had to happen. There was no destination. Just genuine presence. What happened in that space surprised me — not because anything dramatic occurred, but because of how different the quality of the experience was. That encounter is what Lovehoney's 2026 research ca

Somewhere in year seven of our marriage, Brittney and I stumbled onto something I later discovered has decades of research behind it. We didn't call it sensate focus at the time. We called it slowing down. We called it taking the destination off the table. What we were doing was one of the most consistently validated practices in the field of human sexuality — and almost no couple outside a clinical setting has ever heard of it.

I build technology for intimate connection. Coelle is a guided audio platform. I believe deeply in what thoughtfully designed technology can do for people's intimate lives. So when I say the rise of AI intimacy is one of the most alarming developments in the current relationship landscape, I'm not saying it from technophobia. I'm saying it from knowing precisely what technology can and cannot do — and watching that line get dangerously blurred in 2026.

Brittney knew something was off in our intimate life before I did. Not because she was more perceptive — but because she was living in her body in a way I wasn't quite living in mine. She felt the flatness before she could name it. I, on the other hand, was largely in my head. By the time I understood intellectually that something needed to change, she had been feeling it for considerably longer. Here's what the research shows about why the body knows first — and what to do w

The first time I encountered the Gottmans' research, I was struck by something specific: their approach wasn't built on theory first. It was built on observation. Thousands of hours watching real couples interact — identifying with unusual precision what distinguished couples whose relationships flourished from those whose relationships deteriorated. Here's what their framework actually says and how I draw on it in coaching.

One of the most consistent discoveries I've made in my coaching work is how rarely people have genuinely examined their own erotic experience with honest, sustained attention. Not because they don't care. But because shame, cultural silence, and the absence of real education in this territory means most adults arrive at long-term relationships carrying a complicated relationship with their own desire that has never been directly examined.