Why Only 1 in 3 Young Adults Is Actively Dating — And What It Means for Intimacy
- Scott Schwertly

- Jun 9
- 6 min read
I think about the couple I might have been at twenty-five if I'd grown up in 2026 instead of the late nineties.
I was already a cognitively oriented person who processed life from my head first and my body a distant second. I already had a complicated relationship with vulnerability — the Type 4 tendency toward depth and meaning alongside a real difficulty with the specific exposure that genuine intimate pursuit requires. And I came of age in an era when the social infrastructure for meeting people — in person, through shared community, through the natural friction of actual physical presence — was still largely intact.
The young adults navigating dating in 2026 are doing so in conditions that make the specific discomfort of genuine intimate pursuit significantly more avoidable than it has ever been. And the data suggests, with unusual specificity, that a significant number of them are choosing that avoidance — not out of hostility to connection, but out of a combination of depleted confidence, accumulated relational hurt, and a digital environment that offers the feeling of connection without most of its costs.
The implications of this for intimacy — for the specific capacities that genuine intimate relationship requires and that the dating recession is leaving undeveloped — are worth examining honestly.

What the Research Actually Shows
The 2026 State of Our Unions report, published jointly by the Wheatley Institute at Brigham Young University and the Institute for Family Studies, examined the dating experiences of 5,275 unmarried young adults between the ages of 22 and 35. Its findings document what the researchers are calling a "dating recession" — a significant and measurable decline in active dating among young adults who, for the most part, still want to marry and form families.
The headline finding: only 31% of respondents reported being active daters — dating once a month or more. Three quarters of women (74%) and nearly two-thirds of men (64%) had not dated at all or had dated only a few times in the preceding year.
This is not primarily a desire problem. According to the Institute for Family Studies analysis, 86% of the sample said they expected to marry someday. Two-thirds called marriage an important life goal. Nearly half said they would like to be married now. The desire for meaningful intimate relationship is present. The active pursuit of it is not.
The researchers identified the primary barriers as a lack of confidence in dating skills — only 36% reported feeling confident they could read social cues on dates — and the accumulated impact of past relational hurt. More than half (55%) agreed that their breakups had made them more reluctant to begin new romantic relationships. Nearly half (45%) had passed up opportunities for new relationships because of bad experiences from previous ones.
According to a Fox News analysis of the same data, the average time young adults spend in person with friends in a given week has fallen by 50% since 2010. The social infrastructure through which previous generations developed the specific skills of in-person connection — reading body language, tolerating the discomfort of genuine exposure, navigating the natural friction of real human encounter — has significantly eroded. Young adults are spending approximately four hours per day on social media. They are spending dramatically less time in the kind of in-person social contexts that build the relational capacities that dating — and later intimate relationship — require.
According to CNBC's 2026 reporting on why young Americans are dating less, financial concerns are also a significant factor — with 48% of Gen Z adults and 40% of millennials saying the cost of dating interferes with their financial goals. The specific combination of skill deficits, accumulated hurt, digital avoidance options, and financial barriers is producing a generation that wants intimate connection and is finding the path toward it increasingly difficult to navigate.
What the Dating Recession Is Actually About
The data paints a specific picture that is worth naming clearly — because the narrative around young adults and dating often defaults to either dismissal ("they're just lazy") or alarm ("civilization is ending") without engaging honestly with what's actually happening.
What's actually happening is that a generation raised in digital environments has developed significantly less practice with the specific discomforts of genuine in-person vulnerable connection than previous generations had by the same age. This is not a character flaw. It is the predictable outcome of an environment that offered increasingly comfortable alternatives to the specific friction that genuine relational development requires.
Genuine intimate pursuit — the willingness to express interest in someone, to tolerate their uncertain response, to show up imperfectly and stay anyway — requires a tolerance for vulnerability that is developed through practice. Previous generations developed that practice largely involuntarily, through the social infrastructure of school, community, church, and neighborhood that required in-person interaction as a baseline condition of daily life.
The young adults of 2026 have spent formative years in digital environments where the specific discomforts of real in-person exposure can be consistently avoided. Not because they're cowards — because the avoidance was always available and rarely cost them anything obvious in the moment. The cost has been cumulative and largely invisible: a significant gap in the specific relational confidence and embodied social capacity that genuine intimate relationship requires.
Why This Matters for Intimacy Specifically
This is where the dating recession data becomes directly relevant to the work I do with individuals and couples — because the specific capacities that the dating recession is leaving undeveloped in younger adults are the same capacities that intimate relationship requires throughout its entire duration.
The capacity to tolerate vulnerability without retreating.
The willingness to express genuine interest in someone, to share genuine feeling, to be seen in one's wanting without immediate certainty of reciprocation — this is the foundational vulnerability that intimate pursuit requires. And the research is clear that a significant portion of young adults in 2026 have not developed this capacity, or have had it damaged by accumulated relational hurt and have not rebuilt it.
This capacity does not automatically develop with age. It develops through practice — specifically through the repeated experience of being vulnerable and surviving it, of taking relational risks and finding that the self is not destroyed by the outcome. The young adult who consistently avoids dating never develops it. And the older adult who carries accumulated relational hurt without addressing it finds it progressively more difficult to access.
The capacity to read and respond to another person's embodied presence.
The data on social cue reading is striking: only 36% of young adults felt confident they could read social cues on dates. This is a somatic capacity — the ability to be present to another person's physical signals, to notice what their body is communicating, to respond to the subtle nonverbal language of genuine human encounter. It is developed through in-person practice. It atrophies in digital environments. And its absence in intimate relationship produces exactly the disconnection and misattunement that most couples who seek coaching are navigating.
The capacity for genuine presence rather than managed presentation.
Digital social environments reward curated presentation — the carefully constructed version of oneself that receives the desired response. Genuine intimate relationship requires the opposite: the willingness to be present as you actually are, unedited and uncertain, with another person who is doing the same. The young adult who has spent years developing skill at curated digital presentation has often simultaneously been developing a complicated relationship with genuine unmediated presence — the specific quality of just being there, without the protective layer of editing and management, that intimate connection requires.
What This Means for Nashville's Young Adults and Couples
Nashville's population skews young and ambitious. The dating recession is not an abstract national phenomenon — it is the lived experience of a significant portion of Nashville's young adult community. And the specific capacities it is leaving undeveloped will shape the intimate relationships that this generation eventually forms.
For Nashville's young adults who are navigating the dating recession: the path forward is not more sophisticated dating strategy. It is the deliberate development of the specific capacities — vulnerability tolerance, embodied presence, genuine in-person social engagement — that the digital environment has atrophied. These capacities are developable. They respond to intentional practice. And they are exactly what coaching is designed to support.
For Nashville couples who formed their relationship in the digital era and who recognize some of these patterns in their own intimate dynamic: the dating recession didn't end when the relationship began. The specific gaps in embodied presence, vulnerability tolerance, and genuine intimate capacity that shaped the dating experience continue to shape the relationship. Understanding that is the beginning of addressing it.
Book a free discovery call and let's talk about what developing genuine intimate capacity — the specific vulnerabilities and embodied presence that genuine connection requires — could look like for you.
And if you'd like to begin developing genuine embodied presence and intimate vulnerability in a private, guided context, Coelle offers audio experiences specifically designed to cultivate exactly these capacities — at your own pace, in your own space.
Scott Schwertly is a Nashville-based sex and intimacy coach, founder of Coelle, and co-host of Do You Feel That? with his wife Brittney.




Comments